Humiliation: This is just Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!

[jonno1]

Got some nice WAM (Wet And Messy for the uninitiated) humiliation shots for you here. Girls in office and evening wear with my own personal favourites, pantyhose and high heels, rolling in mud and getting soaked on British streets - all in public! For viewer from outside the United Kingdom, bear in mind that this country is perpetually COLD - so apart from being completely humiliated, these girls are also FREEZING.

[jonno1]

More WAM humiliation...

[jonno1]

Hey, we all like some anal humiliation, don't we?

[jonno1]

I ask you: what were the circumstances which led to a girl as gorgeous as this allowing herself to be anally used and humilated on the internet in front of millions of viewers?

[stoat]

Some public stuff...

[SeedFeeder]

Not to interrupt, but it would seem to me that this thread is sort of drifting from it's original topic. Many of the last several posts depict nothing more than oral sex, or simple nudity, which most people would not construe as "humiliation".

-SeedFeeder

[jonno1]

Totally wrong. There are degrees of humiliation. A candid shot of a real life girlfriend cajoled into posing in lingerie, or nude in public, or giving head while looking submissively into the camera and therefore at potentially millions of viewers on the internet can be infinitely more humiliating than a staged set showing a professional porn model doing something more calculated and 'extreme'. Putting on stockings and suspenders (garter belt for US readers) is submissive - ie: the girl is wearing completely superfluous clothing associated with perceiving women as sex objects singularly for the benefit of men's entertainment. A blowjob per se is seen by many as a submissive act; receiving a facial is definitely an act of submission - look at your 1990s porn films, where actresses would often conspicuously try to avoid the facial. Now, if you want to appear in adult films and you won't take a facial, forget it - there are ten more girls in the queue who'll readily do so. Being partially undressed in public is humiliating - the girls are wearing stockings and garters and so on; how do you think you'd feel walking through a town centre in just your underpants? Empowered? I don't think so. Any kind of bondage has a humiliation aspect. Even a girl pulling off her high heels and padding around in her stockinged feet is humiliating to a degree - she has made herself soft and vulnerable by doing so. Look at any single picture on this thread and empathise with how the girl must feel. Imagine you, yourself, as the girl in the photo. Do you think you'd find that humiliating? Would you feel humiliated? I reckon you would. On one hand, I like the extreme stuff - pissing, bukkake, bondage, etc -
but if you can't appreciate the subtler nuances of humiliation you're missing out! Sorry if I've rambled, but I think this is a superb thread and one of the most interesting things about it is how all of the contributors have interpreted the concept of 'humiliation'. I for one am going to do my bit to keep it going.

[grandesupreme]

Hear, here Jonno!

[jonno1]

Hey, thanks for your rapid and positive response Grandsupreme. I hope other regular visitors to this thread will share our view and contribute accordingly. I think they will. Let's keep this thread going. Cheers, mate.

[The Shape]

I won't quote Jonno because it would take too long to read his rambling reply again Just kidding though, he made some good points, it means different things to different people and I understand what he is saying.

Keep going Jonno, you have posted some great pics in this thread.

The Shape