February 2009's Wife/Girlfriend of the month

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greyhound

OK - JL has sent me the original picture (4.41 MB).
I have reduced the size (to 627 KB).
Here it is a "bit" more sharp.

But a handwritten sign would be much better (if possible).

---

this is so fake I can't believe this is even discussed.
no shadows, the perspective of the paper doesn't match the perspective of what's on it, lighting doesn't match.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greyhound

OK - JL has sent me the original picture (4.41 MB).
I have reduced the size (to 627 KB).
Here it is a "bit" more sharp.

But a handwritten sign would be much better (if possible).

---

I still think it's quite obvious that this is a photo that has been altered!!
This entry should be deletet until the user can produce an adequate verification pic.

To "JLproductions" or Jeff: I will happily make an appology if you prove me wrong, I can promise you that!

Peace & love,

Mia

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bnmnewswingers

Some of my favorite pics from our personal collection. One is from our actual wedding night.

---

Thanks, bnmnewswingers!!

Lovely post! :)

You've got my vote!

Kisses,

Mia

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miajoh69

I still think it's quite obvious that this is a photo that has been altered!!
This entry should be deletet until the user can produce an adequate verification pic.

To "JLproductions" or Jeff: I will happily make an appology if you prove me wrong, I can promise you that!

Peace & love,

Mia

---

Thanks for the input...but please remember that providing verification pics isn't an absolute requirement for entry to the competition. If you take a look at the voting......JLproductions has not been granted verified status.

So in essence, the pics remain, but theyre not considered verified.

Val

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valenuk1

Thanks for the input...but please remember that providing verification pics isn't an absolute requirement for entry to the competition. If you take a look at the voting......JLproductions has not been granted verified status.

So in essence, the pics remain, but theyre not considered verified.

Val

---

Thanks, Val!

I hear you loud and clear! Rules are rules, you are absolutely right (and I am not). I'm sorry if anyone gets upset, but in my opinion a fake verification pic is worse than no verification pic at all!

/Mia

Couldnt help it :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by utopia

Couldnt help it :)

---

lol funny ! well i think the mods should decide if it's fake or not, or perhaps we could do a vote to see what are thinking people here ;)!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bubbles1234

Here is our first competition entry for February '09!

Updated 02-24-2009 09:10 PM

posted the wrong pics before

**Moderator Edit**

I've merged your entries into one post to help with the voting process. Hope you do not mind :o

---

no worries!! thanks for doing that!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by utopia

Couldnt help it :)

---

haha....there's always one funny fucker out there....:p

How you keeping anyways dude, I hope your well.

Val

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bubbles1234

no worries!! thanks for doing that!

---

Your Welcome

Val

goooo bubbles ^^

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kevinjones

I am confused.

I thought this was supposed to be a Thread for Wifes/Girlfriends/Friends Types, not paid models with some other guy cumming on them. Maybe I am wrong, who knows. My pics are all either my ex's or some fuck buddies.

And the other thing that confuses me JL is why you would have the money to "fund" paying for these girls to model for you, but you dont have the few bucks a month to pay for your own premium membership???

But what do I know, I am just a guy that likes to cum on girls and take pictures of it.

Good luck to everyone in the competition though!

Regards
Kevin

---

Absolutely. And he's not the only one in this thread (although she does have some humility and recognises that).

Meanwhile, we have a poster who goes to the trouble of verifying but gets DQd on a 'technicality'. IMO, that would be OK if verification was mandatory. It seems ridicuolous when unverified people have won and will continue to.

So well done to whoever enforced the 'technicality'. We won't be seeing any more from a genuinely hot member's GF. I'm going to refrain from being involved in the forum from now on. No uploads, no interaction, no thanks. The community feel is in danger of being lost here, with things dominated by fakers and 'paid for' models. When my plat membership lapses again, that's it. I'll find a forum where egos don't rule, but genuine porn does.

In the meantime, my votes will be going to those genuine entries.

Uncut1974 of course!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valenuk1

haha....there's always one funny fucker out there....:p

How you keeping anyways dude, I hope your well.

Val

---

Hehe, Yeah I thought it was funny :)

Im doing good..and how are you mate??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by beeefy

Absolutely. And he's not the only one in this thread (although she does have some humility and recognises that).

Meanwhile, we have a poster who goes to the trouble of verifying but gets DQd on a 'technicality'. IMO, that would be OK if verification was mandatory. It seems ridicuolous when unverified people have won and will continue to.

So well done to whoever enforced the 'technicality'. We won't be seeing any more from a genuinely hot member's GF. I'm going to refrain from being involved in the forum from now on. No uploads, no interaction, no thanks. The community feel is in danger of being lost here, with things dominated by fakers and 'paid for' models. When my plat membership lapses again, that's it. I'll find a forum where egos don't rule, but genuine porn does.

In the meantime, my votes will be going to those genuine entries.

---

Beeefy, I'm growing increasingly tired of your usual posting manner, which is always so negative and bitter.

If you can do better, prove it...if you can't and youve got nothing positive to add, then why do you bother commenting at all ?

Val

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by beeefy

Absolutely. And he's not the only one in this thread (although she does have some humility and recognises that).

Meanwhile, we have a poster who goes to the trouble of verifying but gets DQd on a 'technicality'. IMO, that would be OK if verification was mandatory. It seems ridicuolous when unverified people have won and will continue to.

So well done to whoever enforced the 'technicality'. We won't be seeing any more from a genuinely hot member's GF. I'm going to refrain from being involved in the forum from now on. No uploads, no interaction, no thanks. The community feel is in danger of being lost here, with things dominated by fakers and 'paid for' models. When my plat membership lapses again, that's it. I'll find a forum where egos don't rule, but genuine porn does.

In the meantime, my votes will be going to those genuine entries.

---

Sorry you feel that way beeefy, but there is something you are missing. A pic is either verified.... or not. There is no "inbetween" nor technicality. I assume you are talking about "airchrist" well here is the problem: What good does a pic that says "I love FF' do if the person is not in the shot? The Answer is absolutely nothing. It's the same as no sign or verification at all, in fact it makes it look like the woman has no idea the pics are going up.

To your point about fakers, we find them and if they are fake they get removed. I don't see any instances of fakers winning. Also if you look at Feb contest, both people in the lead now are homemade and verified. That should tell people something about the way it works and really goes against your comments. If you think that favoritism or egos are what makes mods say who is in or out, you are wrong.

Maybe "airchrist" was real, but the only way we will ever know is a "verified" pic.

The Shape

I voted for a couple of my favs but really my heart hopes Bubbles1234 wins!! Great facial and I happen to love the tats!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CumAngel

Great facial and I happen to love the tats!!!

---

so do I, they got my vote!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valenuk1

Beeefy, I'm growing increasingly tired of your usual posting manner, which is always so negative and bitter.

If you can do better, prove it...if you can't and youve got nothing positive to add, then why do you bother commenting at all ?

Val

---

What are you talking about? Do better at what? What am I saying I'd do better?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Shape

Sorry you feel that way beeefy, but there is something you are missing. A pic is either verified.... or not. There is no "inbetween" nor technicality. I assume you are talking about "airchrist" well here is the problem: What good does a pic that says "I love FF' do if the person is not in the shot? The Answer is absolutely nothing. It's the same as no sign or verification at all, in fact it makes it look like the woman has no idea the pics are going up.

---

I think we're actually on the same track here. Airchrist may not have provided verification that his girl had given consent, but the photos he supplied did verify that the girl was in his room. It wasn't just some random pics nabbed from the web.

And by allowing entries that have no verification whatsoever, how do we know that the girls in question have provided consent to their pics being posted?

If we want to go down the route of girls providing consent, then ALL entries should be verified. IMO, it was an inconsistent decision against Airchrist and I doubt he'll post photos of his hot girl here ever again. Who can blame him?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by beeefy

What are you talking about? Do better at what? What am I saying I'd do better?

---

To start with how about having a more positive posting manner. You could do better at that ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by beeefy

If we want to go down the route of girls providing consent, then ALL entries should be verified. IMO, it was an inconsistent decision against Airchrist and I doubt he'll post photos of his hot girl here ever again. Who can blame him?

---

Beeefy, your not in the posession of the full facts nor do I intend to publicly detail them here. Needless to say an informed decision has been taken on the information provided by the user in question.

End of discussion.

Val

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valenuk1

Beeefy, your not in the posession of the full facts nor do I intend to publicly detail them here. Needless to say an informed decision has been taken on the information provided by the user in question.

End of discussion.

Val

---

Maybe. But could you please point out how DQing someone for failing to provide evidence that their GF gave consent whilst allowing unverified entries represents a consistent decision?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by beeefy

Maybe. But could you please point out how DQing someone for failing to provide evidence that their GF gave consent whilst allowing unverified entries represents a consistent decision?

---

At the risk of repeating myself "....your not in the possession of the full facts nor do I intend to publicly detail them here. Needless to say an informed decision has been taken on the information provided by the user in question."

I tied the vote,oh hell.......c'mon guys and vote for one of these absolutely beautiful women.It's a tough call this month,that's for certain.:D

Nice pics this month !
I liked Bnmnewswingers, Bubbles1234, Kevinjones, Loocker (great ! we really need more of your pics), Spermosaurus (poorly, the eyes censure kills facial pics).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CumAngel

I voted for a couple of my favs but really my heart hopes Bubbles1234 wins!! Great facial and I happen to love the tats!!!

---

thank you very much!!

It's unfortunate that the mood on the forums has been a bit sour this last week, both here and on CumAngel's thread. It must make the lovely women who share their photos feel unappreciated to read a bunch of bitching and moaning—instead of the praise that they deserve.

With one of the hottest verification pics ever!

A verified pic doesn't have to be a facial. Technically, the girl doesn't have to be revealing anything. If you deal privately with valenuk1, you may not even have to have the sign read "FF" (it just has to be something he suggests so we know it wasn't taken previously or for other purposes). But this girl's verification pic is actually THE HOTTEST PIC IN THE SET!

Oh no we're losing!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bubbles1234

Oh no we're losing!

---

Sorry for that http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...1&d=1236191727

But still I feel this regarding your pictures and content http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...1&d=1236191892

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bubbles1234

Oh no we're losing!

---

When it comes to facials, there's no such thing as losing ;)

Since you are a moderator I take a great amount of pleasure in reading these words because there are so many amazing pictures on here from everyone!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jzzr

With one of the hottest verification pics ever!

A verified pic doesn't have to be a facial. Technically, the girl doesn't have to be revealing anything. If you deal privately with valenuk1, you may not even have to have the sign read "FF" (it just has to be something he suggests so we know it wasn't taken previously or for other purposes). But this girl's verification pic is actually THE HOTTEST PIC IN THE SET!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gargot25

When it comes to facials, there's no such thing as losing ;)

---

Spot on, gargtot25!! :)

You are so right!!!

Probably the best comment in here for long, maybe ever?!

;)

Love,

Mia

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Shape

Sorry you feel that way beeefy, but there is something you are missing. A pic is either verified.... or not. There is no "inbetween" nor technicality. I assume you are talking about "airchrist" well here is the problem: What good does a pic that says "I love FF' do if the person is not in the shot? The Answer is absolutely nothing. It's the same as no sign or verification at all, in fact it makes it look like the woman has no idea the pics are going up.

Maybe "airchrist" was real, but the only way we will ever know is a "verified" pic.

The Shape

---

I just want to point out one thing. I have been around in this community for quite some time, and in the last three years, I've been fairly quiet, well mannered, and extremely "real".

Last time I entered the contest with my exwife, not one accusation was thrown up about the legitimacy of my entry. Why now does this become such an issue? It's not as if I had just joined this forum in the last few months. I took a picture with a sign to show that I'm legit, and yet it DQ'd me because you mods felt that I was being underhanded, when in fact my lady just didn't want to hold a sign advertising for this site. She didn't want her face to be linked directly to a website.

It's the communities loss. With every bad mod decision, you are losing customers. I'm proud of my fiance and we were very much planning on contributing more, but we will have nothing to do with a site that caters to fakers and pro-am contest entries. That's undermining the entire contest.

It was fun while it lasted.

that is a great verification bnmnewswingers ,huge faceload of cum and a shout to the forum,nice boobs ready to burst out too.

thank you very much,you have my vote sweety.:)


http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...6&d=1233977151

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spence

that is a great verification bnmnewswingers ,huge faceload of cum and a shout to the forum,nice boobs ready to burst out too.

thank you very much,you have my vote sweety.:)


http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...6&d=1233977151

---

I agree, that is a great verification pic. Thanks guys.

The Shape

Being as you seem intent to debate this matter publicly, ive decided to advise EVERYONE of the discussions we have held, so that they can make there own informed decision.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by airchrist

Honestly, between you and me, XXXX and I have been fighting all this week, and our relationship appears to be on the rocks. I'm sure me asking her to pose with a FF.com sign now would not go over swimmingly. I'm sorry I can't verify. Hopefully, we can verify them later on and be vindicated.

Thanks anyway...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valenuk1

Thanks for the reply Airchrist & the honesty provided....sadly thought it leads to even greater concern that I have with the whole consent thing.

Im not saying you lying, but i find it hard to believe that your lady has consented to have her pic uploaded....at the very same time as you relationship is 'on the rocks'...it doesn't add up to me.

Ive therefore taken the decision to remove your entry form the competiton. Im sorry to have had to do this but I feel its the correct course of action considering the circumstances that you have advised me of.

Trust you understand.....if not, then drop me a PM.

Val

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by airchrist

No. Actually, I don't agree with your decision. Her and I got into a fight about our wedding, which has been resolved. It was heated, but the fight occurred well after I posted OUR entry.

I honestly don't quite understand this huge fuss over this. I've been a member for three years now and haven't seen anyone taken out of the competition because of an admin's concern over whether the couple is fighting.

I'm really quite pissed off that you would take it upon yourself to remove OUR entry. I've seen many entries that were either completely fake or total shit, and yet they remained in the contest.

I'll never contribute anything else, for fear it may be taken down. I so clearly am not a troll or liar. But since you have your reservations and you're the admin, you have final say. I'll go back to lurking...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valenuk1

Airchrist.

Im sorry that you feel that way, however I think you may have missed the point. The concern is over having the proper consent to post, rather than whether or not your arguing.

Based on the material facts that YOU have solely provided me, the moderating team fell that the action taken was & is still warranted.

If you care to look back over the various competitions that have been run in the past there have been numerous occassions where others have tried to lie/fake & cheat there way into the competition, as well as where we have removed pics over the issue of consent to post.

Simply put if a ladies face shown on the pics we have to make a conserted effort to make sure that they are genuine and that the lady featured has given her permission. To date this box has not been ticked by yourself...nor does it look like being ticked either. If nothing esle, we are protecting the lady in question that you are willing to expose.

JL's post in the comp thread will be given the same curtesy that yours were given. The appropriate action will be taken accordingly, depending on the response we receive.

I trust the above clarifies the thought process & the decision why we have taken our course of action.

There's nothing stopping you from verifying in the future, and as youve rightly pointed out...you would therefore be vindicated.

Valenuk1

---

This is just the hottest thing I have ever seen. http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...6&d=1233977151

Bubbles1234 FTW ;) ;)

Competition is really though this month ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valenuk1

Being as you seem intent to debate this matter publicly, ive decided to advise EVERYONE of the discussions we have held, so that they can make there own informed decision.

---

So, coming back to my original point about consistent decisions, will you be removing/barring all unverified entries from here on in?