Quote Originally Posted by beeefy View Post
Absolutely. And he's not the only one in this thread (although she does have some humility and recognises that).

Meanwhile, we have a poster who goes to the trouble of verifying but gets DQd on a 'technicality'. IMO, that would be OK if verification was mandatory. It seems ridicuolous when unverified people have won and will continue to.

So well done to whoever enforced the 'technicality'. We won't be seeing any more from a genuinely hot member's GF. I'm going to refrain from being involved in the forum from now on. No uploads, no interaction, no thanks. The community feel is in danger of being lost here, with things dominated by fakers and 'paid for' models. When my plat membership lapses again, that's it. I'll find a forum where egos don't rule, but genuine porn does.

In the meantime, my votes will be going to those genuine entries.
Sorry you feel that way beeefy, but there is something you are missing. A pic is either verified.... or not. There is no "inbetween" nor technicality. I assume you are talking about "airchrist" well here is the problem: What good does a pic that says "I love FF' do if the person is not in the shot? The Answer is absolutely nothing. It's the same as no sign or verification at all, in fact it makes it look like the woman has no idea the pics are going up.

To your point about fakers, we find them and if they are fake they get removed. I don't see any instances of fakers winning. Also if you look at Feb contest, both people in the lead now are homemade and verified. That should tell people something about the way it works and really goes against your comments. If you think that favoritism or egos are what makes mods say who is in or out, you are wrong.

Maybe "airchrist" was real, but the only way we will ever know is a "verified" pic.

The Shape