Quote Originally Posted by The Shape View Post
Sorry you feel that way beeefy, but there is something you are missing. A pic is either verified.... or not. There is no "inbetween" nor technicality. I assume you are talking about "airchrist" well here is the problem: What good does a pic that says "I love FF' do if the person is not in the shot? The Answer is absolutely nothing. It's the same as no sign or verification at all, in fact it makes it look like the woman has no idea the pics are going up.
I think we're actually on the same track here. Airchrist may not have provided verification that his girl had given consent, but the photos he supplied did verify that the girl was in his room. It wasn't just some random pics nabbed from the web.

And by allowing entries that have no verification whatsoever, how do we know that the girls in question have provided consent to their pics being posted?

If we want to go down the route of girls providing consent, then ALL entries should be verified. IMO, it was an inconsistent decision against Airchrist and I doubt he'll post photos of his hot girl here ever again. Who can blame him?