February 2009's Wife/Girlfriend of the month

[battery]

goooo bubbles ^^

[beeefy]

I am confused.

I thought this was supposed to be a Thread for Wifes/Girlfriends/Friends Types, not paid models with some other guy cumming on them. Maybe I am wrong, who knows. My pics are all either my ex's or some fuck buddies.

And the other thing that confuses me JL is why you would have the money to "fund" paying for these girls to model for you, but you dont have the few bucks a month to pay for your own premium membership???

But what do I know, I am just a guy that likes to cum on girls and take pictures of it.

Good luck to everyone in the competition though!

Regards
Kevin

Absolutely. And he's not the only one in this thread (although she does have some humility and recognises that).

Meanwhile, we have a poster who goes to the trouble of verifying but gets DQd on a 'technicality'. IMO, that would be OK if verification was mandatory. It seems ridicuolous when unverified people have won and will continue to.

So well done to whoever enforced the 'technicality'. We won't be seeing any more from a genuinely hot member's GF. I'm going to refrain from being involved in the forum from now on. No uploads, no interaction, no thanks. The community feel is in danger of being lost here, with things dominated by fakers and 'paid for' models. When my plat membership lapses again, that's it. I'll find a forum where egos don't rule, but genuine porn does.

In the meantime, my votes will be going to those genuine entries.

[aaa34]

Uncut1974 of course!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[utopia]

haha....there's always one funny fucker out there....

How you keeping anyways dude, I hope your well.

Val

Hehe, Yeah I thought it was funny

Im doing good..and how are you mate??

[valenuk1]

Absolutely. And he's not the only one in this thread (although she does have some humility and recognises that).

Meanwhile, we have a poster who goes to the trouble of verifying but gets DQd on a 'technicality'. IMO, that would be OK if verification was mandatory. It seems ridicuolous when unverified people have won and will continue to.

So well done to whoever enforced the 'technicality'. We won't be seeing any more from a genuinely hot member's GF. I'm going to refrain from being involved in the forum from now on. No uploads, no interaction, no thanks. The community feel is in danger of being lost here, with things dominated by fakers and 'paid for' models. When my plat membership lapses again, that's it. I'll find a forum where egos don't rule, but genuine porn does.

In the meantime, my votes will be going to those genuine entries.

Beeefy, I'm growing increasingly tired of your usual posting manner, which is always so negative and bitter.

If you can do better, prove it...if you can't and youve got nothing positive to add, then why do you bother commenting at all ?

Val

[The Shape]

Absolutely. And he's not the only one in this thread (although she does have some humility and recognises that).

Meanwhile, we have a poster who goes to the trouble of verifying but gets DQd on a 'technicality'. IMO, that would be OK if verification was mandatory. It seems ridicuolous when unverified people have won and will continue to.

So well done to whoever enforced the 'technicality'. We won't be seeing any more from a genuinely hot member's GF. I'm going to refrain from being involved in the forum from now on. No uploads, no interaction, no thanks. The community feel is in danger of being lost here, with things dominated by fakers and 'paid for' models. When my plat membership lapses again, that's it. I'll find a forum where egos don't rule, but genuine porn does.

In the meantime, my votes will be going to those genuine entries.

Sorry you feel that way beeefy, but there is something you are missing. A pic is either verified.... or not. There is no "inbetween" nor technicality. I assume you are talking about "airchrist" well here is the problem: What good does a pic that says "I love FF' do if the person is not in the shot? The Answer is absolutely nothing. It's the same as no sign or verification at all, in fact it makes it look like the woman has no idea the pics are going up.

To your point about fakers, we find them and if they are fake they get removed. I don't see any instances of fakers winning. Also if you look at Feb contest, both people in the lead now are homemade and verified. That should tell people something about the way it works and really goes against your comments. If you think that favoritism or egos are what makes mods say who is in or out, you are wrong.

Maybe "airchrist" was real, but the only way we will ever know is a "verified" pic.

The Shape

[CumAngel]

I voted for a couple of my favs but really my heart hopes Bubbles1234 wins!! Great facial and I happen to love the tats!!!

[jonsi79]

Great facial and I happen to love the tats!!!

so do I, they got my vote!

[beeefy]

Beeefy, I'm growing increasingly tired of your usual posting manner, which is always so negative and bitter.

If you can do better, prove it...if you can't and youve got nothing positive to add, then why do you bother commenting at all ?

Val

What are you talking about? Do better at what? What am I saying I'd do better?

[beeefy]

Sorry you feel that way beeefy, but there is something you are missing. A pic is either verified.... or not. There is no "inbetween" nor technicality. I assume you are talking about "airchrist" well here is the problem: What good does a pic that says "I love FF' do if the person is not in the shot? The Answer is absolutely nothing. It's the same as no sign or verification at all, in fact it makes it look like the woman has no idea the pics are going up.

I think we're actually on the same track here. Airchrist may not have provided verification that his girl had given consent, but the photos he supplied did verify that the girl was in his room. It wasn't just some random pics nabbed from the web.

And by allowing entries that have no verification whatsoever, how do we know that the girls in question have provided consent to their pics being posted?

If we want to go down the route of girls providing consent, then ALL entries should be verified. IMO, it was an inconsistent decision against Airchrist and I doubt he'll post photos of his hot girl here ever again. Who can blame him?