February 2009's Wife/Girlfriend of the month

[gargot25]

Oh no we're losing!

When it comes to facials, there's no such thing as losing

[bnmnewswingers]

Since you are a moderator I take a great amount of pleasure in reading these words because there are so many amazing pictures on here from everyone!

With one of the hottest verification pics ever!

A verified pic doesn't have to be a facial. Technically, the girl doesn't have to be revealing anything. If you deal privately with valenuk1, you may not even have to have the sign read "FF" (it just has to be something he suggests so we know it wasn't taken previously or for other purposes). But this girl's verification pic is actually THE HOTTEST PIC IN THE SET!

[miajoh69]

When it comes to facials, there's no such thing as losing

Spot on, gargtot25!!

You are so right!!!

Probably the best comment in here for long, maybe ever?!



Love,

Mia

[airchrist]

Sorry you feel that way beeefy, but there is something you are missing. A pic is either verified.... or not. There is no "inbetween" nor technicality. I assume you are talking about "airchrist" well here is the problem: What good does a pic that says "I love FF' do if the person is not in the shot? The Answer is absolutely nothing. It's the same as no sign or verification at all, in fact it makes it look like the woman has no idea the pics are going up.

Maybe "airchrist" was real, but the only way we will ever know is a "verified" pic.

The Shape

I just want to point out one thing. I have been around in this community for quite some time, and in the last three years, I've been fairly quiet, well mannered, and extremely "real".

Last time I entered the contest with my exwife, not one accusation was thrown up about the legitimacy of my entry. Why now does this become such an issue? It's not as if I had just joined this forum in the last few months. I took a picture with a sign to show that I'm legit, and yet it DQ'd me because you mods felt that I was being underhanded, when in fact my lady just didn't want to hold a sign advertising for this site. She didn't want her face to be linked directly to a website.

It's the communities loss. With every bad mod decision, you are losing customers. I'm proud of my fiance and we were very much planning on contributing more, but we will have nothing to do with a site that caters to fakers and pro-am contest entries. That's undermining the entire contest.

It was fun while it lasted.

[spence]

that is a great verification bnmnewswingers ,huge faceload of cum and a shout to the forum,nice boobs ready to burst out too.

thank you very much,you have my vote sweety.


http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...6&d=1233977151

[The Shape]

that is a great verification bnmnewswingers ,huge faceload of cum and a shout to the forum,nice boobs ready to burst out too.

thank you very much,you have my vote sweety.


http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...6&d=1233977151

I agree, that is a great verification pic. Thanks guys.

The Shape

[valenuk1]

Being as you seem intent to debate this matter publicly, ive decided to advise EVERYONE of the discussions we have held, so that they can make there own informed decision.

Honestly, between you and me, XXXX and I have been fighting all this week, and our relationship appears to be on the rocks. I'm sure me asking her to pose with a FF.com sign now would not go over swimmingly. I'm sorry I can't verify. Hopefully, we can verify them later on and be vindicated.

Thanks anyway...

Thanks for the reply Airchrist & the honesty provided....sadly thought it leads to even greater concern that I have with the whole consent thing.

Im not saying you lying, but i find it hard to believe that your lady has consented to have her pic uploaded....at the very same time as you relationship is 'on the rocks'...it doesn't add up to me.

Ive therefore taken the decision to remove your entry form the competiton. Im sorry to have had to do this but I feel its the correct course of action considering the circumstances that you have advised me of.

Trust you understand.....if not, then drop me a PM.

Val

No. Actually, I don't agree with your decision. Her and I got into a fight about our wedding, which has been resolved. It was heated, but the fight occurred well after I posted OUR entry.

I honestly don't quite understand this huge fuss over this. I've been a member for three years now and haven't seen anyone taken out of the competition because of an admin's concern over whether the couple is fighting.

I'm really quite pissed off that you would take it upon yourself to remove OUR entry. I've seen many entries that were either completely fake or total shit, and yet they remained in the contest.

I'll never contribute anything else, for fear it may be taken down. I so clearly am not a troll or liar. But since you have your reservations and you're the admin, you have final say. I'll go back to lurking...

Airchrist.

Im sorry that you feel that way, however I think you may have missed the point. The concern is over having the proper consent to post, rather than whether or not your arguing.

Based on the material facts that YOU have solely provided me, the moderating team fell that the action taken was & is still warranted.

If you care to look back over the various competitions that have been run in the past there have been numerous occassions where others have tried to lie/fake & cheat there way into the competition, as well as where we have removed pics over the issue of consent to post.

Simply put if a ladies face shown on the pics we have to make a conserted effort to make sure that they are genuine and that the lady featured has given her permission. To date this box has not been ticked by yourself...nor does it look like being ticked either. If nothing esle, we are protecting the lady in question that you are willing to expose.

JL's post in the comp thread will be given the same curtesy that yours were given. The appropriate action will be taken accordingly, depending on the response we receive.

I trust the above clarifies the thought process & the decision why we have taken our course of action.

There's nothing stopping you from verifying in the future, and as youve rightly pointed out...you would therefore be vindicated.

Valenuk1

[cumstain]

This is just the hottest thing I have ever seen. http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...6&d=1233977151

[Kermi]

Bubbles1234 FTW

Competition is really though this month

[beeefy]

Being as you seem intent to debate this matter publicly, ive decided to advise EVERYONE of the discussions we have held, so that they can make there own informed decision.

So, coming back to my original point about consistent decisions, will you be removing/barring all unverified entries from here on in?