Great observations Mr. W. Looking further I discovered a few more invalid assumptions:

For instance, they NEVER serve to accurately indicate the wearer’s propensity for sexual activity or promiscuity.

http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...1&d=1556044314
http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...3&d=1556044490


Of course they’re always a reflection of a fashion trend and NEVER used to provocatively draw attention to other body parts

http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...5&d=1556044314
http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...8&d=1556044543


Their somewhat restrictive nature NEVER is indicative of the wearer’s submissive nature

http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...7&d=1556044314
http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...4&d=1556044490

And finally, always serving as the most subtle of understatements, they NEVER draw attention to the wearer as showy or arrogant.

http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...2&d=1556044490
http://www.facialforum.net/attachmen...2&d=1556044543